Internal Security | 2019-12-25 14:46:00


Agencies Investigating the Delhi Blast Case


1. Delhi Police – Special Cell (Lead Agency)

  • Primary agency responsible for the investigation
  • Conducts arrests, custodial interrogation, and crime-scene reconstruction
  • Identifies the conspiracy chain—planners, executors, and facilitators
  • Analyzes digital evidence (mobile phones, call data records, chats, GPS)
  • Prepares and files the charge sheet before the court

2. Intelligence Bureau (IB) – Intelligence Support

  • Provides real-time intelligence inputs
  • Tracks radicalisation, sleeper cells, and extremist modules
  • Identifies foreign links, cross-border coordination, and funding channels
  • Assists in preventive surveillance to avert future attacks

3. Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) – Technical & Scientific Role

  • Examines explosive materials and blast residue
  • Conducts digital forensics on seized electronic devices
  • Matches forensic evidence with accused persons
  • Strengthens prosecution by providing scientific and legally admissible proof

4. National Investigation Agency (NIA) – Conditional Takeover

  • Can take over the case if:
  • Inter-state terror networks are involved
  • International terrorism links are established
  • Offences fall under UAPA (scheduled offences)
  • Ensures uniform national-level investigation of terrorism cases

Why Is a Multi-Agency Approach Important for Internal Security?

1. Complex Nature of Modern Terrorism

  • Terror attacks involve multiple layers—planning, logistics, funding, execution
  • No single agency possesses all required intelligence, legal, and technical capacity

2. Intelligence Sharing and Coordination

  • Combines ground-level policing with strategic intelligence
  • Reduces intelligence gaps and duplication of effort
  • Enables faster identification of networks rather than isolated individuals

3. Stronger Evidence and Conviction Rates

  • Forensic + digital + human intelligence ensures watertight cases
  • Improves chances of conviction and judicial credibility

4. Preventive Internal Security

  • Helps identify sleeper cells and future threats
  • Strengthens early-warning systems
  • Shifts focus from reaction to prevention and disruption

5. Federal and National Security Balance

  • State police handle ground realities
  • Central agencies address inter-state and international dimensions
  • Ensures cooperative federalism in internal security

6. Policy and Structural Strengthening

  • Improves Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
  • Enhances multi-agency intelligence mechanism (MAIM)
  • Supports capacity building in cyber, forensic, and counter-terrorism domains

Legal Framework Supporting Multi-Agency Action

  1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
  2. Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act – UAPA
  3. Laws on electronic and digital evidence

Challenges in Multi-Agency Investigations

  1. Jurisdictional overlaps
  2. Information silos
  3. Coordination delays